On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 1:59 PM, Arthaey Angosii<[log in to unmask]> wrote: > On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 8:31 AM, David McCann<[log in to unmask]> wrote: >> While <ch> for /tS/ and <sh> for /S/ are >> unobjectionable, it's hard to say the same about <gh> for /dZ/, <hh> >> for /x/, <jh> for /Z/. > > I actually do use <jh> for /Z/ in the Asha'ille romanization. I came > up with the orthography before I started studying linguistics and was > unaware of <zh> being more common for that sound. At this point, I > don't really want to change it. :) I've had <jh> for /Z/ in Ilion. It looks a little out of place, though, and I'm not happy with it. I'm note sure what to replace it with, though, as I want to avoid <z> entirely (too angular for the aesthetic I'm going for) as well as the Na´ve Anglophone Won't Mangle It Principle (one of my design constraints, albeit one that's somewhat flexible).