On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 12:20 AM, Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 8:47 PM, <deinx nxtxr> <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > >> It wouldn't hurt to get permission first. > > Unless, of course, the process of getting permission takes longer than > the kill date of Geocities. As long as you still have a local copy on your hard drive, the kill date of Geocities is irrelevant. You could always put it back up somewhere else. On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 12:46 AM, <deinx nxtxr> <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > Sai Emrys wrote: > >> On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 8:47 PM, <deinx nxtxr> <[log in to unmask]> >> wrote: >>> >>> But they don't publish them. >> >> Yes they do. There'd not be much point in an inaccessible archive. > > The point being to store the data for the search engine to use. They don't > have to actually display the entire page in a list of results. For Google, yes. For Archive.org, making cached pages available is the point. On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 1:13 AM, Rick Harrison <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > > The article was first published in Bibliotheca > Sacra, a journal of the Dallas Theological Seminary. (It was republished as > a stand-alone pamphlet which I own a copy of.) Whether they still hold the > rights or the rights reverted to the author and so forth is not something I > want to delve into. AIUI academic journals do not hold copyright to contributed content: papers are not work-for-hire. I could be wrong, but it seems like that would be an odd arrangement.