Print

Print


The status of [N] and [h] in English is a good exmaple of why 
complementary distribution is not a sufficient condition to deduce 
allophony. However, it occured to me the other night that for a language 
with the right history, it would be possible for [N] and [h] to be 
allophones.

An ancestral [k] undergoes one of two sound changes, depending on its 
environment.

1) [k] >> [x] >> [h]
2) [k] >> [g] >> [N]

As long as environments 1 and 2 remain distinct, [h] and [N] will remain 
allophones of a single underlying phoneme. Bonus points if there are 
morphological processes that lead to such things as

suN <=> suha
Nom     Acc

Pete