Print

Print


This:

<deinx nxtxr> wrote:
>> Running it *live* on the list (as was suggested before) would do that too.
>
> It would but it would add to an already busy list, as well as burn up one of
> the five alloted daily messages (this really needs to be increase to at
> least ten, if not totally uncapped) each time we post.

And this:

Alex Fink wrote:
> Look, at this point we've collectively probably written, oh, at least four
> times as much text about how to reorganise this game than actual description
> of the in-game language.  And that's a bit silly.

And this:

Peter Bleackley wrote:
> We need to have "torch passed" messages on the list from now on.


I am having trouble understanding the real reason for keeping it
offlist. Because there is some other reason, isn't it? Otherwise it
would be very silly.

I would like to follow it. If I hadn't been too busy then I would have
participated.


--
Veoler