Print

Print


On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 19:33, Garth Wallace <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Perhaps without natlang precedent, but what about <cg> for /g/ in
> positions where <g> would be interpreted as /dZ)/?

Interestingly enough, the opposite sequence <gc> *is* in use for /g/
in a natlang -- namely, Irish (for a mutated ("eclipsed") form of <c>
/k/, where the original letter is kept but becomes silent while the
mutated sound is expressed by an additional letter prefixed to the
original one).

Cheers,
Philip
-- 
Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>