Print

Print


I would have guessed that bur for it being atached to the verb in the
latter examples..

On Friday, November 20, 2009, Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> 2009/11/20 Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>:
>> AGT?
>
> AGenT. I thought that was standard abbreviation practice? Just in
> case, PAT was for PATient, INAN was for INANimate, PTCP for
> ParTiCiPle.
>
> C.
>

-- 
Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>