Print

Print


David Peterson skrev:
> On Nov 16, 2009, at 3◊00 PM, Alex Fink wrote:
> 
>> On Mon, 16 Nov 2009 13:21:51 -0800, Garth Wallace <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>
>>> On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 7:45 AM, taliesin the storyteller
>>> <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>>> 90D. Internally-headed relative clauses
>>>> 90E. Correlative relative clauses
>>>> 90F. Adjoined relative clauses
>>>> 90G. Double-headed relative clauses
>>> Internally-headed? Double-headed? Adjoined?
>> They're all described in http://wals.info/feature/description/90 .  To try
>> to demonstrate the differences with schematic Englishings:
>>
>> the familiar relative clause: the fish [that the man bought] was fresh
>> internally headed: [the man bought *the fish*] was fresh
>> correlative: that the man bought the fish; it was fresh
>> adjoined: the fish was fresh; that the man bought (it)
>> double-headed: the fish [that the man bought the fish] was fresh
> 
> This is a perfect and concise example of exactly how all these
> things work.  Can we put it up somewhere, like a wiki...?  I think
> it'd be useful to be able to refer to this in future.

<http://wiki.frath.net>?

Preferably add [[Category:Grammar]]

/BP

/BP