Eugene Oh wrote: > Did I see that right? Prevli <dopk÷> is pronounced /domik/? I love languages > with nonphonemic writing. Tickles the brain! No no, sorry to disappoint :-)) /domik/ is the _phonemic/underlying_ form, the via regular metathesis > **domki, then **dopki then > dopk÷ with height+rounding-harmony. All perfectly regular phonological rules :-))) Things like this, which characterize the language, are one reason why the La˝-la˝ have never been able to devise an orthography for their language.