On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 4:45 PM, Patrick Dunn <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Not to be excessively picky, but this is actually an alphabet, not a
> syllabary.  A cool looking alphabet, granted, but a syllabary has a
> completely different symbol for each possible syllable.
> It reminds me of the Korean alphabet, actually.

It was sort of inspired by Hangul.

As to whether it is or is not a syllabary, well, I guess that's open
to interpretation.

Suppose we just call it a syllalphabetary.