On Jun 8, 2010, at 11◊32 AM, Dana Nutter wrote:

> I don't see any NCNC issues except maybe where people start pushing
> their beliefs on others as with that first paragraph expecting others
> to bend rather than just accepting the fact that not everyone has the
> same belief system.  You can't discuss the semantics of religious
> terms without getting into the subject matter itself.  I'm not even
> sure what the "sacred name" is therefore can't say whether I've ever
> used it or not but certain terminology has to be used to explain
> things.

I agree. Asking someone on the Conlang list not to use "the
sacred name" is definitely NCNC. If you have a problem with
what someone is saying, that's what NCNC is for. Just say the
discussion is getting into NCNC, and that should be more than

"Sunlü eleškarez ügrallerüf üjjixelye ye oxömeyze."
"No eternal reward will forgive us now for wasting the dawn."

-Jim Morrison

LCS Member Since 2007