On 26 Aug 2010, at 08:30, Verhaar, P.A.F. wrote:

>  The question
> is more if it is possible to refer to a canonical schema (a schema
> maintained at the website) in the first place. 
yes, it should be. if thats broken, I shall look to fix immediately.
obviously you can't do the in-document modularisation thing with W3C like you
can with DTD

> I have found a number of W3C schemas at
> Nevertheless,
> when I try to validate one of our TEI documents using the
> "tei_allPlus.xsd" schema, for instance, this produces various kinds of
> errors in TEI, which appear to concern the schema rather than our TEI
> file. 

do you really need allPlus? that mixed namespace scheme is pretty flaky in XSD
Sebastian Rahtz      
(acting) Information and Support Group Manager
Oxford University Computing Services
13 Banbury Road, Oxford OX2 6NN. Phone +44 1865 283431

Sólo le pido a Dios
que el futuro no me sea indiferente