On 26/09/2010 13:29, Deiniol Jones

>>>> Indeed, indeed! There is not a shred of evidence for the
>>>> existence of any of the Insular Celtic peculiarities
>>>> (VSO word order, initial mutations, profusion of spirants
>>>> from the lenition of stops, etc.) in Gaulish, Lepontic
>>>> or Celtiberian! These languages are much more similar to
>>>> Latin in their structure than they are to Insular
>>>> Celtic.

>>> Absolutely - yet if a conlang occurs that purports to be a
>>> survival of a Continental Celtic language, what's the
>>> betting it will have most, if not all, of these features!

>> The only Continental Celtic conlang I am aware of is Dan
>> Jones's
>> Arvorec, and it *does* have all those features. Sigh.

  > Well, it's supposed to! :D Arvorec came about in 
response to
> the elimination of the Brythonic languages in Ill Bethisad,
> and so was *supposed* to be a fairly typical Insular-style
> language. Interestingly, Ranko Matasovic makes a case that
> all these typically "Celtic" features present in the modern
> Insular languages are the result of intensive language
> contact during the late Dark Ages:

Yes, I've always thought, at least in case of the Brythonic 
languages, that these changes dis not occur until after the 
Roman period.

But I can go along with a Celtic language on the fringe, as 
it were, of Britain exhibiting many, if not all, of these 
features.  What I was thinking of was some Celti-conlang in, 
say southern Gaul, north-west Spain, or maybe along the 
Danube or even a survival in some remote part of Anatolia of 
the ancient Galatian language.

I can just imagine someone thinking: "What if Galatian had 
continued to spoken? It was a Celtic language, so my 
neo-Galatian will have to have initial consonant mutations etc."

"Ein Kopf, der auf seine eigene Kosten denkt,
wird immer Eingriffe in die Sprache thun."
[J.G. Hamann, 1760]
"A mind that thinks at its own expense
will always interfere with language".