Of course adding new words is not a reform, but how can eliminating a whole letter from the alphabet not be a reform? It's not the same as removing the daft hats, as that would mean simply WRITING h^ differently, as hh or hx for example. If I wanted to eliminate the letter h from Ido, would that not be a reform of Ido? And are you saying that the "Foundation" of Esperanto doesn't prescribe what letters should make up the alphabet? This is all very odd IMO.