See, I could see writing a sentence like that on purpose (i.e. where the point is to have a large fronted clause), or as a joke. I find it bizarre that this is what comes out in a supposedly bare-bones news article trying to be informative. But, hey, it did make my brain work a little harder, so I guess that's a good thing. ;) David Peterson LCS President [log in to unmask] www.conlang.org On Jul 17, 2011, at 7◊44 PM, Roger Mills wrote: > Via Google+, David Peterson posted the following: > <quote> From an article on the arrest of Rebekah Brooks, this is easily one of the worst constructed sentences I've ever read in print. This is worthy of Language Log. > > "Because ever since News International and its parent company News Corporation were seriously damaged 13 days ago by the allegation that the phone of the murdered schoolgirl Milly Dowler was hacked at the instigation of the News of the World, News International has been on an explicit mission to demonstrate that Mrs Brooks was innocent of all wrongdoing."</quote> > > I don't find it all that bad :-))) and have probably written similar things in first drafts or in a hurry. It would be better if the "News Int'l has been....." clause came first, [comma], then dele "Because" and continue with "ever since....News of the World[period]"