We don't have much of a problem in English, although a Texan and a Jordie
may not understand each other, at the extreme.

But many languages, like Arabic, have dialectal differences that impede
comprehension.  If you force people to write a standard written dialect,
many of them will have to learn a foreign language in order to read and
write, a huge impediment.  Better to give everyone the means to write their
own language; then those who want to use the standard dialect can learn both
its spoken and written forms.   (Chinese, in the same situation, abandons
the attempt to write sounds.)

In any case, learning any written language is easier if the orthography is
phonemic (assuming you already speak it).

On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 5:05 PM, Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 4:40 PM, Sam Stutter <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> >... one results in text which may be largely incomprehensible between
> dialect groups separated by only short distances. I'm writing my English and
> phonetically realising it ass sumthingg lak this, whereas someone 30 miles
> away will be realising sumtin laē this ...
> I used to belong to a group that corresponded in the Shavian alphabet
> (this was back in pre-Internet days) and pen palls from England wrote
> with a British accent that my American ears "heard" when I read what
> they wrote.
> Maybe we need a writing system that bears absolutely no relation to
> the spoken language at all. Just use an alphabet of arbitrary
> squiggles put together in some arbitrary way for each word.
> --gary