Print

Print


Sebastian and TEI-L,

On 8/19/2011 12:16 PM, Sebastian Rahtz wrote:
> In some ways, this may be easier to write and maintain? Since HTML a simpler schema by far.

In the general case I'd think so, yes; plus it's reusable.

Yet given how difficult it is to predict how HTML might be invalid, to 
the extent you can constrain and manage your inputs, you could find it 
more sensible to do it Conal's way. Or split the job between both. It 
depends.

Cheers,
Wendell

======================================================================
Wendell Piez                            mailto:[log in to unmask]
Mulberry Technologies, Inc.                http://www.mulberrytech.com
17 West Jefferson Street                    Direct Phone: 301/315-9635
Suite 207                                          Phone: 301/315-9631
Rockville, MD  20850                                 Fax: 301/315-8285
----------------------------------------------------------------------
   Mulberry Technologies: A Consultancy Specializing in SGML and XML
======================================================================