Print

Print


> Furthermore, this discussion isn't a "witch hunt," to use one
> characterization, or a question of speculating on motivations. John
> Unsworth made it clear in his initial statement that "strategic
> priorities" were part of the issues between the Board and Chair. Surely
> those "strategic issues" are relevant to the upcoming elections to both
> Board and Council?

Instead of reading through past email exchanges between board members and
the former chair, why don't we simply ask ALL the people who run for the
board (not just former board members) to write up statements about their
strategic priorities?