Print

Print


I also followed the rules.  Which, if not following the rules is the 
rule, you could say I dislike following rules so I didn't follow the 
rule about not following rules...

;-)



On 09/06/2011 10:48 AM, R A Brown wrote:
> On 06/09/2011 15:35, Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets wrote:
>> On 6 September 2011 16:19, Patrick
>> Dunn<[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>
>>> Hrmph.  I was a good little rule follower and
>>> responded with just a number, even though I *really*
>>> wanted to list them.
>>>
>>> Apparently, I was the only one.
>
> No you weren't! There were at least two of us   :)
>
>>> That's what I get for following rules.
>>>
>>>
>> Frankly, you've been on this list for quite a while, and
>> this is not the first survey here.
>
> Indeed not - I've answered this question posted in different
> wording at least twice before - probably more.
>
>> By now you should know that we *never* follow the rules.
>> You might even call that the... rule :P .
>
> In this case, 'twas easier to follow the rule. When
> languages are actually quoted, they tend to get longer with
> each person's postings     ;)
>
> It depends what one means by "study" - I could rattle of a
> whole long list, since I've been 'studying' as many
> languages as I could lay my hands on for the past 67 years!
>