I think that if phonology is not your interest, then you can more or less
ignore it.  Pick a subset of English sounds that you like, add a different
emphasis (perhaps the first syllable of every word is stressed?) or a
stringent consonant/vowel structure (perhaps as simple as
Consonant-Vowel-Consonant-Vowel) and I feel like you could have something
that doesn't feel too much like English but is still simple to pronounce
for English speakers.

When I created my primary language I really didn't pay much attention to
phonology.  Over time, as my interest and aptitude developed, I
incorporated more and more exotic (relative to American English) sounds.
As a result, my conlang Angosey has a core of easy to pronounce words,
followed by a layer influenced by Kiswahili, then a layer influenced by
Korean.  One can then back-historicize this as stages in the language's

The great thing about conlanging is that there is no instruction manual.


2012/2/28 Daniel Burgener <[log in to unmask]>

> I find grammar, morphology, and pretty much everything about language that
> I've learned except for phonology to be absolutely fascinating.  However,
> as someone with no linguistics training, phonology just gives me a really
> hard time.  Whenever I try to start a new conlang, I usually start with
> phonology, and get bored and stopped before I get it looking like I want
> it.  My central problem is that I have trouble making a phonology
> interestingly different from English, partially because I have a lot of
> trouble pronouncing most non-English phonemes (In terms of consonants,
> essentially I can pronounce English, the German ch, and dental stops  For
> vowels, I generally can't tell them apart at all).
> Lately I've found myself wishing I could just skip the phonology section or
> take care of it in a few minutes and get on to the interesting parts right
> away.  Are there any shortcuts I could take that would allow a non-linguist
> to quickly create a phonology that's interesting, easy for someone with
> only experience in English, German and Spanish to pronounce, and not
> totally "cookie cutter"?
> Thanks.