Print

Print


On Thu, 29 Mar 2012 16:15:21 -0500
Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> > Clearly there is some underpondian bias in that test! :))
> Clearly.  Quite a number of the usages are extremely (or at least
> somewhat) non-American, and a few of the vocabulary items (like ruck)
> simply don't exist on this side of the pond.

But do you only read books written by Americans? I know what a shoat
and a chook are, although no English person would ever use either word.