Print

Print


Description is my weakness. The verb form applies to proper names. I don't 
understand your questions. I also have difficulty in communication, like 
explaining things.
Emerging poet
Pen Name Mellissa Green
Budding novelist
tweet me



GreenNovelist

blog


www.theworldofyemora.wordpress.com


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Padraic Brown" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Friday, October 19, 2012 6:59 AM
Subject: Re: Yardish Grammar


> --- On Fri, 10/19/12, Nicole Valicia Thompson-Andrews 
> <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
>> A personal verb is a verb that
>> applies to a person by name, like Anoxia
>> walked down the street, walked is the personal verb, since
>> is named.
>
> So does each person have her own conjugation? or is there simply a form
> to be used with any personal name? If the former, does the individual
> get to choose her own morphology or is it bestowed by some arcane
> priesthood? Is it bad form to use someone else's morphology? Can 
> morphology
> be bequeathed to an heir like a family treasure? Or is it placed in the
> mathom along with the busts and trophies of the ancestors? Or are there
> related forms that circulate among families, so that you can tell what
> clan someone is from just by the way people talk about her? How elaborate
> are the forms and how distinct from each other are they? Are they related
> in some way to the individual's name? Do you still have to specify the
> person's name when using these personal verb forms? Are these obligatory
> in this culture or optional?
>
> Again: elaborate please! One line questions and one line responses are, as
> others have said already, very frustrating. Especially from someone who
> advertises herself as a "budding novelist"! Or are you trying to corner 
> the
> market on the piconovel?
>
> Padraic
>
>> Emerging poet
>> Pen Name Mellissa Green
>> Budding novelist
>> tweet me
>>
>>
>>
>> GreenNovelist
>>
>> blog
>>
>>
>> www.theworldofyemora.wordpress.com
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>> From: "Logan Kearsley" <[log in to unmask]>
>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>> Sent: Friday, October 19, 2012 1:32 AM
>> Subject: Re: Yardish Grammar
>>
>>
>> > On 18 October 2012 23:26, Nicole Valicia
>> Thompson-Andrews
>> > <[log in to unmask]>
>> wrote:
>> >> Can Yardish or any conlang have fictional grammar
>> forms
>> >
>> > If by "fictional" you mean "not occurring in any known
>> natural
>> > language", then yes, of course.
>> >
>> >> like personal verbs?
>> >
>> > And for that you'll have to explain what the heck you
>> mean by
>> > "personal verbs" in this context.
>> >
>> > -l.
>>