On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 10:20 PM, Sam Stutter <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> I can't wait to hear his explanation of why the English word "bog" ≠ "god"
> (бог)! Wait, did the stupid ancient britons (sic) worship a swamp or
> something? :)

> Sam Stutter
> [log in to unmask]
> "No e na'l cu barrii

Oh, the ugly snake of the swamps, of course, since /god/ = [gʌd]=/гад/ =
_snake, scum_, right. And Celtic and Germanic swamp sacrifices are the best
way to prove it.

However, they don't hesitate to "prove" that Celts were Russians (or, at
least, the druids, the wisest, were Russians) since Irish = Russia when
you pronounce it backwards in modern English. That's an *actual*
explanation in a bestselling book, mind you! And Latin word "ovo" for a
concrete notion "egg" comes from Russian (!) word "oval" (with the same
meaning as in English). Yet, these are still not the worst examples.

And this thing was officially taught to my friends in on of the most
prestigious Russian technical universities about 10 years ago. I don't know
what's happening now, maybe this is not done any more, but I knew the
adepts of so-called "New Chronology" personally, and I doubt they went

So when people claim the superiority of English due to its role of the
global lingua franca, it's by far not the ugliest explanation.


> On 16 Dec 2012, at 20:37, Nikolay Ivankov <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> > On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 7:21 PM, George Corley <[log in to unmask]>
> wrote:
> >
> >> On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 12:11 PM, Patrick Dunn <[log in to unmask]>
> wrote:
> >>
> >>>
> >>> Currently, though, the Oa have a fully developed scientific method and
> >> have
> >>> applied it to the study of language.  They have reconstructed
> Proto-Oasa
> >>> and understand their their language is just one derivation from it out
> of
> >>> many.  Just like in our word, people ignorant of the science might make
> >> odd
> >>> claims or assumptions, but educated Oa know that there's no inherent
> >>> primacy in their language.
> >>
> >>
> >> In the real world, even highly educated people have erroneous beliefs
> about
> >> language.  In fact, I think some of the best educated people I've known
> >> really don't know much about linguistics and how language actually
> works.
> >> This includes ethnocentric beliefs  such as the widespread beliefs that
> >> English is exceptionally simple/irregular/expressive/logical or any
> other
> >> thing to justify it being the global lingua franca rather than the
> actual
> >> reasons: international economics, geopolitics, and prestigious cultural
> >> artifacts.
> >>
> >
> > Prof. Fomenko from Moscow State University is one of the saddest examples
> > of this kind. An absolutely brilliant mathematician, both as a researcher
> > and as a teacher. I admire his books and his lectures. And yet the one of
> > the most published author of historical and linguistic profanities, with
> > passages like: "Ancient Russians (sic! - N.I.) grounded a city on Tiber
> and
> > called it with the best word they've had: 'Mir' (peace). However, the
> > ignorant Latin speakers have read this word in the wrong direction, and
> so
> > the name Rim (Russian way of saying 'Rome' - N.I) appeared." The "theory"
> > is based on a "correct" interpretation of astronomical data, and claims,
> in
> > particular, that Peloponnesian War was actually The Fourth Crusade.