Print

Print


2012/12/23 David McCann <[log in to unmask]>:
> On Sun, 23 Dec 2012 00:58:54 -0200
> Leonardo Castro <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
>> Hey, but what about Romance 1st person plural "nos".
>
> That Indo-European form has been considered a derivative of *me (by
> Szemerényi and others):
> me > mes > mes.mes > nsmes analysed as n.sme.s > no.s
> Indo-Europeanists are nothing if not ingenious!

With this and the Amerindian 1st person n-, can't we affirm that 1st
person is ideophonically related to nasality?