Print

Print


Hay diferenti opiniones pri quo es 
li correct variantde 
occidental/interlingue. On vell 
besonar un syncronic e un diacronic 
descriptionn del lingue!

KjR
Stephen Rice skrev 2013-07-05 00:36:
> On 7/4/13, Paul Bartlett <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
>> A couple of weeks ago I posted in my personal webspace a summary of
>> Interlingua grammar (
>> http://www.panix.com/~bartlett/Interlingua_Summary.html ). Anyone with a
>> web browser can read it. Why should I have put it somewhere that anyone
>> curious about Interlingua would have to login or create Yet Another
>> Account With Yet Another Password just to read a simple document? PAHHHHH!
> Agreed. It's important to have the grammar, vocabulary, and a
> collection of texts readily available for anyone interested.
> Esperanto, Interlingua, LFN, and LdP all do a good job of this. Ido is
> fairly good, about on a par with Interlingua, but Occidental is harder
> to find, and some of the material is linguistically outdated. The
> trick is centralizing the links, which Eo doesn't do very well. The
> wiki-based approach of LFN and LdP is the way to go.
>
> Steve
> .
>