Yea much better... this allows you to categorise the interactions too. 

Sent from Samsung Mobile

-------- Original message --------
From: Fabio Ciotti <[log in to unmask]>
Date: 06/11/2013 1:30 PM (GMT+00:00)
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Encoding interactions between characters?

Perhaps a more verbose but consistent way could be to use the @ana
attribute, linked to a set of <interp> tags that enumerates all the
interactions in the text

<sp ana="#character1-to-character2">what char1 says</sp>


<interp xml:id="character1-to-character2">Interaction form Char1 to

2013/11/5 Lou Burnard <[log in to unmask]>:
> On 05/11/13 20:43, Sebastian Rahtz wrote:
>> On 5 Nov 2013, at 20:28, Lou Burnard <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>> I would do this with
>>> <sp who="#character1" whom="#character2">what char1 says</sp>  where
>>> @whom is an attribute I have defined in my ODD.
>> but then its not a TEI solution, if you can't define an archival
>> interchange version
>> based on pure TEI (your notation is fine as an editing format).
> But the TEI allows me to add extensions so long as I document them, I
> believe. And new attributes dont even have to be in a special namespace,
> since all TEI attributes are in the null namespace....
> Oh very well. If you insist, I can't stop you using @corresp  in the sense
> of "vaguely related":
> <sp who="#character1" corresp="#character2">what char1 says</sp>
> This at least has sort of the right semantics and is much more expressive
> than your original proposal!