It doesn't do too terribly translating English to Spanish, and that is
more than a relex. I'm not an expert in Apertium so my opinions are
uniformed, but what I have read so far tells me this is more that what
you suggest. If I thought it would end up being nothing more than a
relex I wouldn't waste my time.

You might dig a little deeper into it before dismissing it as trivial.
These early papers, for example:

I think you will find that it is far more than a mere relexing engine.


On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 10:21 AM, H. S. Teoh <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 10:14:07AM -0800, Gary Shannon wrote:
>> Apertium does translation, not relexing. Relexing could be done with a
>> text editor search and replace.
> Quote from the Apertium wiki:
>         Apertium is a shallow-transfer type machine translation system.
>         Thus, it basically works on dictionaries and shallow transfer
>         rules. In operation, shallow-transfer is distinguished from
>         deep-transfer in that it doesn't do full syntactic parsing, the
>         rules are typically operations on groups of lexical units,
>         rather than operations on parse trees.
> IOW, it's just a relexing system with some added frills. No real
> translation is going on here.
> T
> --
> Маленькие детки - маленькие бедки.