On 20/02/14 09:08, Sebastian Rahtz wrote: > I dont think TEI’s sameAs means what is needed here. Me neither. > > so: > > <person xml:id=“d"> > <persName>David</persName> > </person> > <person xml:id=“s"> > <persName>Syd</persName> > </person> > > <relation > ref="skos:closeMatch" > active=“#d" > passive=“#s”/> This implies that David is disguised as "Syd" , whereas @active="#d #s" would imply that "Syd" and "David" are both disguises of the same person. The more I think about this, however, the less convinced I am that using <person> in this way makes sense. Isn't the whole point about a disguise that it's *not* the same kind of entity as a real person, but more like an assumed name? I think I'd rather propose a new "persona" element, member of model.stateLike, with some substructure if you wish, but otherwise behaving like <persName>. > (or similar). > -- > Sebastian Rahtz > Director (Research) of Academic IT > University of Oxford IT Services > 13 Banbury Road, Oxford OX2 6NN. Phone +44 1865 283431 > > Não sou nada. > Nunca serei nada. > Não posso querer ser nada. > À parte isso, tenho em mim todos os sonhos do mundo.