Yes, B-G-2-3 would have been very difficult to answer the questions for
since it is spoken my means of chromatophores, so no sounds involved, but
colors and patterns instead.  B-G-2-3 "phonolgy" treats colors somewhat
like consonants and patterns somewhat like vowels.

There are a fairish number of exotic conlangs that simply wouldn't be able
to answer your questionaire as set up -- B-G-2-3, Rikchik, the Gripping
Language, KNSL, UNLS, that one with the 8 in the name that I can't remember
or find with Google just now...  Anyway, there is a whole subset of these
things that your questionnaire has consciously, or unconsciously excluded.
 You may wish that to be so for purposes of your research, but in that
case, I think it best to make that explicit in your findings.


On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 3:15 AM, Bettina Beinhoff <[log in to unmask]
> wrote:

> Many thanks for your feedback and your replies; there are 31 responses to
> the questionnaire so far. That's amazing!
> I'm so glad that many of you would be happy to provide a spoken sample of
> your languages. I'll be in touch with you in the next few weeks about this.
> @Gary: In the current project I'm only interested in the sound systems of
> languages, so I cannot include languages that don't have a sound system. I
> might look at morphosyntax in the future, but for now it's phonology I'm
> interested in.
> @Tsiasuk (Jim): Many thanks for your replies and the greetings in Itlani
> :-) I'll certainly get in touch if I have more questions during data
> analysis.
> @ Adam: Many thanks for leaving the spanner out of the works, much
> appreciated ...
> Best wishes,
> Bettina
> On 12 February 2014 19:03, Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> > I thought about using B-G-2-3 to throw a spanner in the works, but Imma
> be
> > nice.
> >
> >
> >