2014-02-28 8:41 GMT+01:00 Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <[log in to unmask]>: [...] > > True, but once again with a good reason: the Welsh alphabet is different > from the Roman alphabet, as seen in this page: > http://www.llangatwg.org.uk/links-w-alphabet.htm. It contains letters not > found in the traditional 26-letter alphabet (digraphs that are considered > single letters) and lacks letters that *are* normally found in the > 26-letter alphabet (k, q, v, x and z). But... żis lacking letters by itself enough to consider an alphabet as a different one? If yes, there were a "Portuguese alphabet" until the last orthographic agreement that included k, w and y in it. I can rapidly recite the alphabet without those letters, but I have to think to insert them.