Print

Print


On 7 Jun 2014 18:35, "Jörg Rhiemeier" <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
> They may be rather poor art, or art that does not fit your taste,
> but they are in my opinion clearly artlangs.

That's another point I failed to articulate in my previous post: even if
you don't like something, it doesn't mean it's not art. It may not be
*your* kind of art, but if someone else thinks it's art who are we to
contradict them? Art is subjective, and so are artlangs, by necessity.
--
Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets
President of the Language Creation Society (http://conlang.org)

Personal Website: http://christophoronomicon.blogspot.com