Print

Print


On Jun 5, 2014, at 5:38 AM, Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> On Wed, 4 Jun 2014 23:58:14 -0500, Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> 
>> On May 29, 2014, at 3:28 PM, Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>> 
>>> Hallo conlangers!
>>> 
>>> It seems that the CONLANG archive database is damaged.  Some old
>>> posts cannot be accessed, yielding the error message:
>>> 
>>> The format of the index file is invalid. Please try again in about
>>> 30 seconds, and report the problem if it persists for more than a
>>> few minutes.
>>> 
>>> (Example: http://listserv.brown.edu/archives/cgi-
>>> bin/wa?A2=ind0906c&L=conlang&T=0&F=&S=&P=36295)
>>> 
>>> This probably also explains the "No Match" cases I reported a few
>>> days ago.
>>> 
>>> Is there any hope that this problem can be fixed, or are we
>>> experiencing an ongoing meltdown?
>> 
>> This makes me uneasy. Has there been any progress on this? Alex, have you been in touch with Brown?
> 
> Yes.  I don't think there's actually any underlying problem (anymore?).  Joerg's example link must have been a sporadic hiccup, of a kind I see occasionally as well; when I see it it's fixed by reloading the page on which the link appears.  

Good.

> 
> Brown's list maintainer and master of Yet Stranger Powers, Peter Dicamillo, wrote me:
>> I'm not aware of any problem with the archives, but I did have Listserv
>> rebuild the search index for CONLANG. Then I tried some quick tests of
>> searching and didn't encounter any problems.
>> 
>> The URL in the example,
>> 
>> http://listserv.brown.edu/archives/cgi-bin/wa?A2=ind0906c&L=conlang&T=0&F=&S=&P=36295
>> 
>> doesn't work because it specifies line 36,295 of the archive file for 0906c
>> (week 3 of June, 2009), but that file has only 21,045 lines. Possibly now
>> that I've rebuilt the index, Listserv would not generate a URL like that. If
>> you can still reproduce the problem, I may need to know what steps you
>> followed, and not just the URL.
>> 
>> The list archives are just a set of plain text files, in the case of
>> CONLANG, one file for each week . So the archives can't become corrupted in
>> the way that a database could be, and I can directly examine them.
> 
> Alex

Ah... there's something to be said for storing things in plaintext :)