Print

Print


There were studies in Japan, long ago.

 

Cited by Esperanto supporters on the old Conlang as very favorable to Eo.

 

Other Eo supporters had done the research.

 

Leo

 

From: International Auxiliary Languages [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Jeffrey Brown
Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2014 6:40 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: How easy is Esperanto really?

 

Note #43 refers to a paper citing almost entirely anecdotal evidence, except for one reputed study with American speakers (who already speak a European language).

Note #44 is no longer available for download.

Note #45 relates to a study of French-speaking students learning Esperanto.

The subsequent paragraphs refer to the ease of acquiring a European natlang after having studied Esperanto (a conclusion I do not contend).

 

Nothing about non-IE speakers learning Esperanto in Wikipedia  :(

 

 

On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 6:06 PM, Wayne Rossi <[log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]> > wrote:

The Esperanto article on Wikipedia cites a study showing the ease of learning Esperanto.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Esperanto#Education

 

The studies performed have shown that not only is Esperanto easier, but learning Esperanto and then studying a third language makes the acquisition of the third language easier.

 

On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 8:44 PM, Jeffrey Brown <[log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]> > wrote:

Often people enthusiastic about Esperanto (or Interlingua, or any auxlang with a European-like grammar and lexicon) state how easy it is to learn, even for those who do not know any European language.

I have been wondering whether this is true. I have never seen any experimental evidence to support this statement, only anecdotes.

Now, Esperanto was quite easy for me to learn, but I already spoke English, French and German at the time, so I was familiar with the grammatical forms and found many of the words instantly recognizable. But, if I had spoken only Cantonese, that wouldn’t have been true.

What I suspect is that Esperanto (and similar) would be rather difficult to learn for someone unfamiliar with European word stock and grammar. But I don’t have any evidence for this either.

Can anyone point me to any studies, not anecdotal testimonials, that support the claim?

Jeffrey