Polysynthesis in itself isn't a particularly rigorously defined concept and
personally I haven't read any evidence that it would even exist as a
distinct underlying category beyond some arbitrarily set morpheme per word
ratio. (If you know of such evidence, please send in the references.)

In this situation it's best to provide your own house definition for what
you mean when talking about polysynthesis to go with questions like this.


2014-09-10 12:08 GMT+03:00 Pete Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>:

> Turkish is a highly agglutinating language, but it's not usually described
> as polysynthetic. However, it is possible to say a single word in Turkish
> that translates as "You are one of those people whom we are not able to
> turn into a city-dweller."
> I thought this sort of one-word sentence was a defining characteristic of
> polysynthesis. So if Turkish isn't considered polysynthetic, why not?
> Pete Bleackley
> The Fantastical Devices of Pete The Mad Scientist -