Oh no! not frame sets!

It is a perfectly straightforward process to push your notes out into a html div, and the text into another html div, and then use the ‘float’ style attribute on the two divs so that your notes appear to the left, or right, or both, of the text they annotate. Simple css, indeed (google "floating div css” for lots of examples).  You can go further, and use javascript/jquery to identify exactly where the text referenced is in your browser window, and then place the annotation at the appropriate hight to the left or right.  And much more.


On Oct 30, 2014, at 12:17 AM, Paul Schaffner <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> I agree: the demotion of marginalia (and the other things that
> people call 'paratext' these days) is to be resisted if at all possible. 
> Perhaps it's time to revive html:frameset ! (one frame for text, 
> one for notes ...)  :)
> pfs
> On Wed, Oct 29, 2014, at 18:07, Elisa wrote:
>> Dear all,
>> Having spent much time with heavily annotated long poems of the 18th- and
>> 19th-c. by the likes of Erasmus Darwin and Robert Southey ( whose very
>> annotations I was just talking about last week at our conference in
>> Evanston), I am aware of how long and complicated these can
>> become--Sometimes whole poems are written out in long footnotes, and
>> quite frequently we see block-level structures, yes. I am not really
>> happy with the common tendency to push annotations to the ends of
>> documents, particularly when they were originally presented so the eye
>> would move across or down a page to a layer of paratext. This may sound
>> awfully unsightly to the e-reader aesthetic, but there is something to be
>> said for having the web interface preserve the positioning of notes
>> embedded within and immediately accessible from the lines of poetry or
>> chunks of prose text in which they're signaled. I don't much like the
>> idea of HTML's losing this simple association of proximity--it seems like
>> caving to convenience and worse, pushing a layer of paratext away from
>> its point of association. But I may just be obsessed with note-heavy Bob
>> Southey.
>> And it was wonderful to meet many of you in person last week!
>> Sincerely,
>> Elisa
>> Sent from my iPad
>> On Oct 29, 2014, at 12:41 PM, Sebastian Rahtz
>> <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>>> On 29 Oct 2014, at 15:24, Martin Mueller <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>>> I need to have a look at more examples. Paul Schaffner probably has all
>>>> the cases in his head. But my hunch, to be confirmed by trawling through a
>>>> sample of the TCP corpus, is that very few marginal notes have internal
>>>> block-level components.
>>> You may be surprised.  I can detect 28504 occurrences in 2448 texts from the 61k texts
>>> in EEBO/ECCO/Evans.  That’s occurring in 1 out 28 books, then.
>>> --
>>> Sebastian Rahtz      
>>> Director (Research) of Academic IT
>>> University of Oxford IT Services
>>> 13 Banbury Road, Oxford OX2 6NN. Phone +44 1865 283431
>>> Não sou nada.
>>> Nunca serei nada.
>>> Não posso querer ser nada.
>>> À parte isso, tenho em mim todos os sonhos do mundo.
> -- 
> Paul Schaffner  Digital Library Production Service
> [log in to unmask] |