Print

Print


Ah, I see.  The wording of your original statement seemed to say the
other.  I think the problem here is the difference between "every" and
"any".

Adam

On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 9:01 AM, Emanuelo Arbaro <[log in to unmask]>
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I was not saying that Ideopedia contains information about every conlang or
> conlanger, it's obviously impossible... I said that every conlang or
> conlanger can be described in this site.
>
> 2014-11-14 14:15 GMT+01:00 BPJ <[log in to unmask]>:
>
> > Den 2014-11-14 02:01, Adam Walker skrev:
> >
> >  On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 11:02 AM, R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>  On 13/11/2014 16:16, Emanuelo Arbaro wrote:
> >>>
> >>>  This is the three major French websites about language
> >>>> creation:
> >>>>
> >>>>  ]snip]
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> http://ideopedia.org (online only) 1. French wiki about
> >>>> every conlang, every conlanger.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>> Nor _every_ conlang, nor _every_ conlanger.  I found
> >>> omissions.
> >>>
> >>>
> >> So did I.  Every single language I ever made is missing.  Oh and
> >> what-the-what??  Somebody made a CONlang and called it Nivkh?  Well,
> Imma
> >> make a conlang and call it French!  Yeah, cause ain't nobody ever heard
> of
> >> that one neither!
> >>
> >
> > Last time I checked there already was a conlang called Standard
> > French! ;-) Basically they took the spelling of 13th century
> > Francien and the pronunciation of 19th century Parisien and
> > called it a language. *Really* weird if you ask me! Seems to be
> > no end to what unrealistic things conlangers can imagine! ;-D
> >
> > /bpj
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Emanuelo Arbaro
> Franca esperantisto, doktora studento pri protestanta teologio
> http://che-emanuelo.blogspot.fr/
> http://emmanuel-wald.webou.net/HTML5/eo/
>