Let me attempt a nutshell summary of the indexing:

Basic clause order is SOV.
If a phrase occupies only one syntactic position it appears sans index.
If a phrase occupies more than one syntactic position then it is marked by
the same index in each position. In the leftmost position the remainder of
the phrase's form precedes the index. In nonleftmost positions, only the
index appears. Nonleftmost indices in object positions follow the V.

Is that accurate?

Are there a potentially unlimited number of distinct indices? If so, how
are they formed?

How is the particular index chosen?

If this were a loglang, there'd be a bunch of further questions I might
ask, but since this is an artlang exolang those questions seem less

On 13 Aug 2015 10:36, "J S Jones" <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> I've added a whole bunch of examples using temporary vocabulary, such as
> Cat and "fish". Some sections still need examples, however. One problem* is
> organization, e.g. Tense needs to follow Clause Chains but Clause Chains
> needs to follow Tense.
> * besides those below
> Jeff
> On Mon, 10 Aug 2015 18:10:39 -0400, J S Jones <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> > I know, you're all waiting for more examples in the documentation, but
> that
> > requires predicates in the vocabulary. I have 2 problems with that that
> need to be
> > solved:
> >  1. I need to figure just how alien the language users are and in what
> ways so I
> >  know what definitions to make predicate roots for (e.g. color terms).
> >  2. I also need to figure out how I should assign roots to the
> definitions. Roots are
> >  either 2 letters, the 1st of which is lower case (a-x), or 3 letters,
> the 1st of which
> >  is upper case (A-X). I could go down the definition list and assign
> them in order
> >  (aa, ab, ac, ...) or semi-philosophically or maybe find a random word
> generator.
> >
> >On Sat, 8 Aug 2015 14:39:12 -0400, J S Jones <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> >
> >> Comment in this thread specifically on the language and documentation.
> >> Please use the old thread for philosophy discussions.
> >>
> >> I've started another chapter on lexical topics; otherwise, I've been
> making
> >> incremental improvements. I'm a bit stuck on how to fix the Basic
> Morphosyntax
> >> organization. I'll probably use an apostrophe as the separator between a
> >> numeric token and a pronominal suffix, e.g. 4#123'5  "It's the 123rd of
> them."
> >> (4 is the index for _them_ and 5 is the index for _it_ here).
> >>
> >>On Thu, 6 Aug 2015 17:33:54 -0400, J S Jones <[log in to unmask]>
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Progris Riport
> >>>
> >>> I've been working on cleaning things up a bit, including uploading the
> >>> mysteriously missing chapter (nobody told me!). The number system is
> >>> now octal, which helps a lot. However, I still haven't made much
> progress
> >>> on the Basic Morphosyntax chapter. Also, I have to decide on which
> separator
> >>> character (at the ASCII level, not the "original" level) to use when a
> numeric
> >>> word takes a pronominal/index suffix.