Print

Print


On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 9:07 AM, Amanda Babcock Furrow
<[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Response below -
>
> On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 10:21:04AM +0100, And Rosta wrote:
>
>> with its perplexed marker.) The interesting thing here is that this conlang
>> existed the way natlangs do, in the mind and speech of the speaker with
>> scant conscious knowledge of the rules that constitute the language. But I
>> can't remember having encountered another such conlang. The closest would

> I think this rather sounds like the case with Aaron Simon (bornforwater)'s
> Sandic.

Yes, I immediately thought of Sandic as well.

-- 
Jim Henry
http://www.pobox.com/~jimhenry/
http://www.jimhenrymedicaltrust.org