What about using a schema that combines the two schemas, like


Note that you need to disable the ID/IDREF checking from 
Options->Preferences -- XML / XML Parser / RELAX NG because there are 
conflicting IDs defined.

Best Regards,
George Cristian Bina
<oXygen/> XML Editor, Schema Editor and XSLT Editor/Debugger

On 24/06/16 02:30, Imsieke, Gerrit, le-tex wrote:
> Hi Gioele,
> Neither an ODD nor a Schematron approach: You can use a second RNG
> schema. Here is a sample schema (that also serves as a blog post about
> this approach):
> I tried to prescribe div/@type attributes in such a way that the types
> correspond to DocBook element names, and the grammar is (roughly) the
> same as in DocBook. So you have parts or chapters in the body, prefaces
> and dedications in the frontmatter, etc.
> The nice thing is that you superimpose a bespoke grammar on an
> off-the-shelf TEI schema. An actual grammar refining an unaltered base
> schema, if that doesn’t sound compelling. You can’t do this with
> Schematron so handily.
> A sample document is here:
> If you open it in oXygen and add a type attribute to body/div, you will
> be presented with a choice of part and chapter.
> This is the good news.
> The bad news is that there will be no other completion hints than those
> from the epischema – unless you swap the xml-model PIs at the top, but
> then you’ll only have the default TEI vocabulary as suggestions.
> Maybe we can convince the oXygen people to restrict the autocomplete
> options to the intersection of the choices that all referenced schemas
> offer at a given location.
> Gerrit
> On 22.06.2016 18:14, Gioele Barabucci wrote:
>> Hello,
>> in ODD, how can I change the constraints of the <div> elements that
>> appear in a certain position (e.g., /TEI/text/body) while using the
>> default definition for all the other elements?
>> I could specify those constraints as a set of Schematron assertions, but
>> those would not be picked up by, for example, oXygen for the automatic
>> completion of element names and attribute values.
>> In RelaxNG one can give two different definitions of <div>: one for
>> those elements appearing in a certain production, and another for all
>> the others contexts. Can the same thing be done in ODD?
>> The use case for this request is that I would like <div>s in
>> /TEI/text/body to contain only few whitelisted elements, while allowing
>> <div> in other places (mainly the header) to be unconstrained.
>> Note: Element names and element definitions are separate entities in
>> RelaxNG; in ODD it looks like element names and their definitions cannot
>> be separated (I suppose this has to do with DTD support). Probably this
>> means that what I am looking for cannot be done, but I think it is worth
>> asking anyway.
>> Regards,