Print

Print


This precise issue was recently raised on the GitHub Issues site for TEI: 
https://github.com/TEIC/TEI/issues/1493 Please comment!

All the best,
Hugh

Sent from my phone. 

> On Aug 18, 2016, at 08:50, Jakub Simek <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> 
> Dear Philipp,
> 
> Thank your very much for the link, I overlooked this discussion from 2013 where the use of <mod type=„subst“> had been suggested as a workaround for those needing this interpretative layer beyond <add> and <del>. However, <substJoin> is still allowed in <line>; and if we allow the „concept" of <mod type=„subst“> there, then frankly I do not see why not use <subst> directly.
> 
> Best wishes, 
> Jakub
> 
> 
>> Am 18.08.2016 um 14:34 schrieb Philipp Vanscheidt <[log in to unmask]>:
>> 
>> Dear Jakub,
>> 
>> maybe this discussion might be helpful for you:
>> 
>> https://listserv.brown.edu/archives/cgi-bin/wa?A2=ind1304&L=TEI-L&P=R10386&1=TEI-L&9=A&J=on&d=No+Match%3BMatch%3BMatches&z=4
>> 
>> Best,
>> Philipp
>> 
>> 
>> Am 2016-08-18 14:25, schrieb Jakub Simek:
>>> Dear list,
>>> Is there any reason why the <subst> element is not allowed as child of
>>> <line> when using the "embedded transcription" approach? The direct
>>> content of <line> is (to my great regret) generally very restricted,
>>> but <add> and <del> are allowed there and even <substJoin> is
>>> permitted as well. Forbidding <subst> as a simple bracket for <del>
>>> and <add> seems like a bug to me, but perhaps there is some
>>> explanation?
>>> Best wishes,
>>> Jakub
>>> ---
>>> Dr. Jakub Simek
>>> Germanistisches Seminar
>>> SFB 933 "Materiale Textkulturen", B06 "Thomasin-Projekt"
>>> Universität Heidelberg
>>> Hauptstraße 207-209
>>> 69117 Heidelberg, Germany
>>> [log in to unmask]
>>> Welscher Gast digital: http://digi.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/wgd
>> 
>> -- 
>> Technische Universität Darmstadt, Institut für Sprach- und Literaturwissenschaft
>> Dolivostraße 15, 64293 Darmstadt
>> Tel.: 06151/1657405
>> [log in to unmask]