I think you may end up wanting <note> and <locus> inside <dimensions>, but certainly poke at the use of the @precision, @scope, @atLeast, @atMost, @min, @max, and @confidence attributes of <dimensions> first. My bet is that describing variability with @min, @max, and perhaps @confidence is likely to be sufficient; but that because this isn't really what @scope was designed for, it may be difficult (or abusive) to use it to express what portion of the manuscript a particular <dimensions> applies to. > How would people go about encoding the dimensions of a manuscript > or other object where the dimensions (either leaf or written space) > vary between different sections of the manuscript? And/or, where a > significant fact about those dimensions should be recorded (e.g. > that the leaves have been sigificantly cropped by a binder). I > should say that we are using <dimensions> not <measure> to record > these dimensions. The obvious solution seems to be to allow <locus> > and <note> inside <dimensions>, and I would like to create a ticket > for this, but I'd like to see if people have any other suggestions > before I do this!