Print

Print


I wonder if *we* should be worried about still being around! :-) I have
actually been continuously subscribed for over two decades. I know for
certain because I still lived in my old apartment the first two years or
so, and we moved together into our present home in January 1998.

/bpj


Den 20 maj 2017 21:41 skrev "A Walker Scott" <[log in to unmask]>:

> Wow! Those names are a blast from the past!
>
>
> On Saturday, May 20, 2017, Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I was just wondering today when the first time was that "ANADEW" was
> > mentioned on Conlang-L, and I dug up the message below from antediluvian
> > times.
> >
> > Regards
> > Carsten
> >
> > On Wed, 5 Mar 2003 14:12:52 -0500, H. S. Teoh <[log in to unmask]
> > <javascript:;>> wrote:
> >
> > >On Wed, Mar 05, 2003 at 07:45:40PM +0100, Andreas Johansson wrote:
> > >> I dunno if we ever made an official name for the law that says that
> for
> > >> any feature you can think up for a conlang, no matter how freaky,
> there
> > >> is at least one natlang that's already doing it, except ten times
> worse.
> > >
> > >Hmm. I've yet to find a natlang with a case system that resembles
> > >Ebisedian's. Not that I doubt it, just that I haven't found any yet.
> > >
> > >> If not, we should give it a shortish name for easy reference.
> > >[snip]
> > >
> > >How about ANADEW? A Natlang's Already Dunnit Except Worse. :-)
> > >
> > >
> > >T
> > >
> > >--
> > >People say I'm indecisive, but I'm not sure about that. -- YHL, CONLANG
> >
>