Print

Print


The "we" who moved together being me, my wife and her kids, none of which
latter have ever been subscribed despite my efforts to pass on the
linguistic bug. I had hopes for my (step)granddaughter but it turns out her
favorite subject is math. :-/

/bpj


Den 21 maj 2017 12:19 skrev "Melroch" <[log in to unmask]>:

> I wonder if *we* should be worried about still being around! :-) I have
> actually been continuously subscribed for over two decades. I know for
> certain because I still lived in my old apartment the first two years or
> so, and we moved together into our present home in January 1998.
>
> /bpj
>
>
> Den 20 maj 2017 21:41 skrev "A Walker Scott" <[log in to unmask]>:
>
>> Wow! Those names are a blast from the past!
>>
>>
>> On Saturday, May 20, 2017, Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > I was just wondering today when the first time was that "ANADEW" was
>> > mentioned on Conlang-L, and I dug up the message below from antediluvian
>> > times.
>> >
>> > Regards
>> > Carsten
>> >
>> > On Wed, 5 Mar 2003 14:12:52 -0500, H. S. Teoh <[log in to unmask]
>> > <javascript:;>> wrote:
>> >
>> > >On Wed, Mar 05, 2003 at 07:45:40PM +0100, Andreas Johansson wrote:
>> > >> I dunno if we ever made an official name for the law that says that
>> for
>> > >> any feature you can think up for a conlang, no matter how freaky,
>> there
>> > >> is at least one natlang that's already doing it, except ten times
>> worse.
>> > >
>> > >Hmm. I've yet to find a natlang with a case system that resembles
>> > >Ebisedian's. Not that I doubt it, just that I haven't found any yet.
>> > >
>> > >> If not, we should give it a shortish name for easy reference.
>> > >[snip]
>> > >
>> > >How about ANADEW? A Natlang's Already Dunnit Except Worse. :-)
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >T
>> > >
>> > >--
>> > >People say I'm indecisive, but I'm not sure about that. -- YHL, CONLANG
>> >
>>
>