I tried it about a year and a half ago, but it was nowhere near ready
enough then for what I wanted to use it for. It seems to have changed a lot
since then though. I'll have to have a look.

On 1 February 2018 at 03:46, Isaac Silbert <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> I've heard about it all the way back to the beginning when it started about
> 3 years ago. It's come a long way since then. I haven't used it in a while
> but from what I remember of it, PolyGlot does a damn good job at keeping
> track of everything. It's constantly being updated and renewed to
> accomodate more and more aspects of the ideal conlang suite.
> -Isaac
> On Thu, 1 Feb 2018 at 10:38 am, David Peterson <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> > Is anyone familiar with PolyGlot? I just heard about it, so if this is
> old
> > news, please excuse the post, but it sounds like the first steps towards
> > the ideal conlang suite I was thinking about. It allows you to
> incorporate
> > orthographies, the way you could with a font in a doc file, but it's also
> > searchable/sortable like a spreadsheet. The page is here:
> >
> >
> >
> > I JUST now found out about it, so I haven't downloaded it and tried it
> out,
> > but I thought I'd share to see if others have seen it, and if so, ask
> what
> > they thought of it.
> >
> > <3
> >
> > -David

Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets
President of the Language Creation Society (

Personal Website:
Personal Tumblr: