Print

Print


If <h> and <j> are not used for anything else, I'd be tempted to just use
them, without modification.

On Tuesday, May 1, 2018, Asher Jaffe <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> I think I've decided to use hl for /ɬ/ and jl for /ɮ/. H and J are not used
> anywhere else in the language. Thoughts?
>
> On Tue, May 1, 2018 at 11:53 AM, David McCann <[log in to unmask]>
> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 30 Apr 2018 18:59:47 -0400
> > Asher Jaffe <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> >
> > > I want to incorporate /*ɮ/ into a conlang of mine, but I'm struggling
> > > on coming up with a satisfying romanization for it. All the existing
> > > orthographies for it are either Zulu "dl" which I will use as a last
> > > resort, "l", which would suggest /l/, or are in Cyrillic. I would
> > > also like to avoid stroked L "ł" as when handwritten it looks a lot
> > > like "t". Do you have any suggestions for my predicament?*
> >
> > It's such a rare sound that IPA seems to be the only transcription
> > system that provides for it. The IPA did recommend a set of
> > hand-written forms for its script and ɮ came out as identical to a
> > common form of eszet, namely
> > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ß#/media/File:Kurrent_ß.svg
> >
>