Print

Print


Yes, THAT would be the acid test, wouldn't it. And a test I'm sure my
hypothetical conlang false decipherment could certainly not pass.


>
> This is the reason why a decipherment of an ancient language is
> considered valid only if *additional* texts that were not used in
> determining the language yield meaningful results. So with regard to the
> Voynich Manuscript, one would have to abstract a language from a *part*
> of it, and then show that the rest of it makes sense in it, too.
>
> --
> ... brought to you by the Weeping Elf
> http://www.joerg-rhiemeier.de/Conlang/index.html
>