>John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
>> antiorp uses a lovely, subtle technique
>About as subtle as a fart.

merc! pour la qualit=E9 de votre contribution
quelle violence. l'expression du d=E9sir
relation th=E9rapeutique ou parent/enfant.


>could you please send me the address' of the lists in question (max
>and x)
>we support your cause

may email the "owner" of the max forum operated by
mcgill university - Christopher Murtagh <[log in to unmask]>

the max forum is currently locked.

that is to say the `democratic` regime controls the data flow
and proclaims `democratic` only that which does not oppose
its rule.

+ as mentioned in prev transmission

if tzo dezire - - - -

comments to : [log in to unmask]
to subscribe to the max forum :

email to : [log in to unmask]
email body : Subscribe MAX


To: [log in to unmask]
=46rom: [log in to unmask] (=3Dcw4t7abs)
Subject: queens english

>Trying to prevent antiorp from posting on this list is clearly a
>violation of free speech.

comments on above + below
in the queens english [which i may add the
b!t revolut!on presentation was for the most part in the queens english
as well hence curious select responses]

not appealing to the free speech routine for it seems
one act of violence against one's reasoning apparatus.
[an act of violence does not constitute an appeal]
likely appealing to one's reasoning apparatus for
the rezults are veritable and hence enduring
[phps until the next m9ndfukc event]

 one can withstand brute force.
 brute reason however is unbearable.
 to quote one
 very lovely personaj

 very amusing indeed it is that
 generally american citizens are the life forms
 opposing the =3Dcw4t7abs routine.
 however it is america which has
 perfected the brute reason routine]

it has always been curious one person is capable of enduring
the transmissions of countless life forms.
countless life forms  however appear to collapse under the transmissions
of one life form.

>So antiorp's post are hard to decipher, sometimes off-topic, and
>sometimes offensive.

it is not any life form's responsibility to
conform to the preference file of one other life form.
it is very much desirable life forms engage in one
sexual reproduction of mind \ cultural data. [m9ndfukc]
that is to say diversity and errors in duplication are indispensable
in fact determine progress.

[consider the implementation of algorithms
 to simulate errors in audio.
 that is to say select humans cannot be appreciative
 of errors until they have programmed them.
 locate this preoccupation a shortcut to intelligence

 apropos - ~2 years (?) prior to prezent
 james mccartney mentioned various data re:
 one system which conformed itself to
 listeners desires.
 as stated then - it is precisely this
 which consider an act of violence against progress

 related - cmj interview with luc ferrari vol 22 nr 3

 it is true am stating one may oppose =3Dcw4t7abs freely +
 is in fact desirable - do not view digital murder
 as opposition - but rather as elimination
 it terminates tension hence the
 reproduction \ m9ndfukc operation]

select life forms may not exactly desire progress
but that they be first. this too is acceptable for
it too constitutes one mode of operation which contrasts one other.

silencing one life form however is objectionable.

re: current max-list debacle -
those in agreement of the current `democratic` regime
are permitted to voice personal opinions.
those opposing the current `democratic` regime
however are urgently destroyed - that is to say
digitally murdered.

it is this injustice which reason finds detestable
hence select sentiments occur. naturally
one is unable to prevent one's sentiments
hence opposition - hence likely - additional digital murders
+ etc etc. process output.

exit with chris murtagh's [the max list "owner"]
opinion re:free speech. am doing so to illustrate fact
0 + 0 has very much changed.


transmitted during the 1st `democratic` vote on the mcgill max forum

">Date:    Sun, 11 Oct 1998 13:55:51 -0500
>From:    Christopher Murtagh <[log in to unmask]>
>Subject: Re: Politics, logical types and servers
>Hi Stephen,
>Just for your interest.  I've had it with these twits, and I really don't
>give a shit what they say about free speech. Before I go, I'm going to boot
>everyone of these assholes who reposts anti-krapmatter. Getting my name put
>up on www pages with insults and swastiks has really done it.
>From: "L-Soft list server at McGill University Computing Centre (1.8d)"
><[log in to unmask]>
>> quiet del max [log in to unmask]
>[log in to unmask] has been removed from the MAX list. No notification has
>been sent.