FFlores wrote:

> Is there any natlang or conlang where an allophone
> of a certain phoneme is also an allophone (maybe the
> only one) of *another* phoneme? Do you think that's
> likely or probable?

I would say that it is likely... but it depends, I suppose, on what do
you call allophones.
In Hangkerimce there are many "allophones" in the sense that the
realizations of the same orthography will be the same, but I have not
clear if those different realizations are considered as realization of
the same sound by native speakers.

For example, K, whose nominal value is unsapirated /k/ are sometimes
realized, in soft positions, as /x/ which could be palatized before an
I, this is the same sound as C (nominal value /C/, voiceless palatal
fricative) after a syllabe final N (n=F3minal value /N/) when the N is in=

a strong (stressed) position.

About natlangs, I don't know if the swedes in this list would considered
that the short <e> is an allophone that is similar to the short <a"> or
if the short <e> is just a short <a">, where long <e> =3D /e:/, long <a">=

=3D /E/, short <e> =3D short <a"> =3D /E/, short <e> before <r> =3D short=
before <r> =3D /&/.

> In this particular case, I have a daughter of Drasel=E9q,
> Curco, where /v/ has the allophones [v] and [w] (the
> latter when syllable-final), and there's also /w/ as
> a different phoneme.
> --Pablo Flores
> * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
>  Weiner's Law of Libraries:
>   There are no answers, only cross-references.

   Chlewey Thompin                              ## ####     ## ## ##
------------------------------------------------##-## ##
   - =BFPor qu=E9 no?
   - No tiene sentido.
   - =BFQu=E9 sentido?  El sentido no existe.
   - El sentido inverso.  O el sentido norte.  El sentido com=FAn, tal
vez.  O sin sentido, como aqu=ED.
    (-- Graeville 2)