Print

Print


Abrigon Gusiq wrote:

> Some form of visual language for translation would be grand, something
> similiar to how Chinese works. Two or more) languages that technically are
> not related can be called Chinese.

Nothing not related to Chinese can (sensibly) be called Chinese.
There are several mutually unintelligible languages (5-9) called
"Chinese".

--
John Cowan      http://www.ccil.org/~cowan              [log in to unmask]
        You tollerday donsk?  N.  You tolkatiff scowegian?  Nn.
        You spigotty anglease?  Nnn.  You phonio saxo?  Nnnn.
                Clear all so!  'Tis a Jute.... (Finnegans Wake 16.5)