At 12:28 PM 9/6/99 -0100, Kuty wrote: >At 22:53 06/09/99 +1300, JM wrote: >>Kuty wrote: >>>Your blatant act was unvailed many times in rec.scuba. >>>You are not naive. You are a spammer and you don't belong >>>here. I only spotted him as a spammer right away in his post in Scuba-L. No wonder I missed his spams in rec.scuba. I was away only FOUR days and found 981 new posts in rec.scuba on my return! Thanks to the "all message read" button, I finished "reading" those 981 posts in about 5 minutes. :-) Rec.scuba USED to have about 10% signal and 90% noise. From a few posts I made there in recent months and the REPLIES posted there from CNs and OCNs, I would estimate it's about 95% noise there now. >>He even posted his crap to fr.rec.plongee and de.rec.tauchen >>:-( Wot? He missed Giovanni's Italiano rec.underwater.golf? :-) >>Kuty: >>> Quite angry again, Hee hee! Nice to see you Kuty with your feather ruffled, and you're not even a BIRD! :-) >>> Kuty >>> >>> With best regards, >>> >>> Kuty > >Jean-Marc: > >>When writing to him, you may want to drop your automatic >>signature. :-) > >LOL. > >I remembered to do it the first time but forgot it in my second one. I >guess I am not very experienced in being angry :-) Kuty, you've been a regular in rec.scuba for awhile. You're a such a SLOW LEARNER in being angry! :-) YOu need to apply what all good scuba scuba divers do ... Practice, Practice, Practice ... in clubbing cretins! There are too many Scuba Cops. We need more Cretin Cops!! <BWG> > >Well, with best regards to the list but none to Mr. Morris, > > Kuty Too bad, Mr. Morris has already singed off Scuba-L. :-) I guess that means none of my questions to him and Strike's question to him about Singapore will ever get answered. ;-( -- Bob.