Nik Taylor wrote:
> I tend to go with a prototype theory, that is, verbs are words that are
> treated like prototypical verbs.  A prototypical verb is an action with
> both a causer and an affected being (i.e., transitive verbs), other
> kinds of verbs are extensions of this, which explains why no languages
> use constructions like "I am the hitter of him", but some do use

        Isn't that the exact construction used in trigger languages, or am I
wrong in my understanding of them?

> constructions like "To me is the car" for "I have the car" (because
> "hit" is a prototypical verb, while "have" isn't)
> Prototypical nouns, on the other hand, are physical objects, while other
> nouns are an extension of that concept.
> --
> "If all Printers were determin'd not to print any thing till they were
> sure it would offend no body, there would be very little printed" -
> Benjamin Franklin
> ICQ #: 18656696
> AIM screen-name: NikTailor

        Christophe Grandsire

        Philips Research Laboratories --  Building WB 145
        Prof. Holstlaan 4
        5656 AA Eindhoven
        The Netherlands

        Phone:  +31-40-27-45006
        E-mail: [log in to unmask]